kernel/rv1106: SARADC VERIFIED — fixed -22 (vref-supply, not clk)
The saradc -22 was regulator_get_voltage on a dummy vref (no vref-supply in DT), not the clk divider. Added vcc_1v8 fixed 1.8V regulator + vref-supply (matching the vendor 86-panel). iio:device0 now reads both channels (in_voltage0_raw=1023, in_voltage1_raw=246) — the adc-keys path works. Five drivers verified this run: wifi, TRNG, OTP, GMAC, SARADC. adc/SARADC-FIX.md; DRIVER-PARITY updated. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017wB8KB3MMQztRDXCMCkPrf
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 4.8
parent
c7ba8781a4
commit
5aedb5e966
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
# SARADC — ✅ VERIFIED on warden-c8a3 (2026-08-25); the -22 was vref, not clk
|
||||
|
||||
The rockchip_saradc probe failed `-22` NOT at clk_set_rate (no "failed to set
|
||||
adc clk rate" ever printed) but at `regulator_get_voltage(info->vref)` — with no
|
||||
`vref-supply` in DT the driver got a **dummy** regulator, and
|
||||
`regulator_get_voltage(dummy)` returns -EINVAL, which probe returns directly (so
|
||||
only the generic "probe failed with error -22" showed). The earlier
|
||||
clk-rv1106-divider theory was wrong (the divider is HIWORD settable, xin24m is
|
||||
registered; clk_set_rate would clamp, not fail).
|
||||
|
||||
**Fix (DT only):** add the 1.8 V reference the vendor 86-panel uses —
|
||||
```dts
|
||||
/ { vcc_1v8: vcc-1v8 { compatible = "regulator-fixed"; regulator-name = "vcc_1v8";
|
||||
regulator-always-on; regulator-boot-on;
|
||||
regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>; }; };
|
||||
&saradc { vref-supply = <&vcc_1v8>; status = "okay"; };
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Evidence:** `iio:device0` (`ff3c0000.saradc`), `in_voltage0_raw=1023`,
|
||||
`in_voltage1_raw=246` — both channels read real analog values (the adc-keys path).
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user