Files
bfe-core1106-sdk/docs/decisions/0007-public-repo-hosted-kernel-build.md
T
BFE Engineering c756622c96 docs: reposition as the 86 Panel development environment
The repo's documentation framed it as a support repo for one product
(WardenOS). Since going public the real audience is anyone with a Luckfox
Pico 86 Panel: a maintained 6.18 kernel, an off-device development loop,
and a device simulator that exist nowhere else for this board. Reframe the
README and top-level docs board-first, with WardenOS documented as the
downstream consumer it is (ADR-0008).

Also an editorial pass over the whole doc set:
- every H1/H2 is now a short title, not a sentence (ADRs, qemu/, patches/,
  drivers/, architecture, NPU feasibility, config-lint, payload); workflow
  flowchart titles fixed at the source in tools/flowgen.py and regenerated
  with fresh bench numbers
- README Quick Start commands verified against the scripts; requirements
  corrected (curl, bare python, gcc >= 14) and the MC/DC gate added as a
  step (run green locally on gcc 14.2)
- dropped the 'needs python (not python3)' vendor dig: build-kernel.sh
  inherited the same requirement (filed #10 to remove it)
- glossed MC/DC and HPMCU on first use; marked the tests/uboot-ab
  reference as flare-edge; deduplicated the three-simulator list into the
  root README table
2026-08-30 22:19:12 -06:00

38 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown

# ADR 0007 — Hosted-Only CI
**Status:** Accepted (2026-08-30). Supersedes the runner half of ADR-0004.
## Context
The repo is going public (free Actions minutes for hosted runners; open-source
alignment with the stack philosophy). Two facts change the ADR-0004 calculus:
1. **A self-hosted runner on a public repo is a standing hazard.** A fork PR
can modify workflow files; once any run of theirs is approved, workflows
can target the repo's registered self-hosted runners — i.e. arbitrary code
on the private host, which also serves production. GitHub's own guidance is
to never attach self-hosted runners to public repos, and personal-account
repos have no runner groups to scope the risk away.
2. **The build never needed the SDK host.** ADR-0004's premise ("needs the SDK
toolchain and Buildroot's baked-in absolute paths") does not apply to
`kernel-build`: the hermetic build is freestanding, uses Debian's
`gcc-arm-linux-gnueabihf`, and self-provisions `python`. It fits a hosted
runner (4 vCPU / 16 GB), and public-repo minutes are free.
## Decision
`kernel-build` runs on `ubuntu-latest`, apt-installing its toolchain, kernel
build deps, and qemu-system-arm, with the pristine tarball cached like
`patches-apply` does. It stays `workflow_dispatch`-only for now (a full build
per push is still noisy; flipping it to push-on-main later is one line). The
`warden-sdk` self-hosted runner instance is **deregistered from this repo**
before it goes public; the flare and flare-edge runner instances on the same
host are unaffected (those repos stay private).
## Consequences
- No path from public workflows to private infrastructure; nothing to babysit
in fork-PR approval settings beyond GitHub's defaults (still set "require
approval for all outside contributors" as belt-and-braces).
- Kernel artifacts no longer persist on the runner host; the GitHub artifact
(5-day retention + prune job) is the only build output channel.
- Hosted kernel builds are slower than the 0640 box but free and parallel;
the boot-smoke step rides along unchanged.